From an article via Drudge:
Moments later, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat and member of the Judiciary Committee, took to the ramparts opposite Mr. Frist.Bring it on!
"It is sad that the president felt he had to pick a nominee likely to divide America instead of choosing a nominee in the mold of Sandra Day O'Connor, who would unify us," he said. "This controversial nominee, who would make the court less diverse and far more conservative, will get very careful scrutiny from the Senate and from the American people."
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and ranking minority on the Judiciary Committee, called the nomination "needlessly provocative."
1 comment:
OK. I would like to ask Schumer what the h-e-double toothpicks DIVERSITY has to do with the Supreme Court?! Is it not their job to interpret the Constitution (as it is written - not add to it) and apply the law?
Can the Constitution be correctly applied only if you have enough colors and X vs Y chromosomes on the bench?
Ohhhh...these idiots on the left are just too much. And why can't the press come up with these questions????? because they are the left!!
Post a Comment