Monday, March 31, 2008

A Post in Two Parts: 1) Doing my voting homework, and, 2) "Stop The Insanity!"

Part One: Doing my voting homework.


You know what I really hate? I hate those election days where I walk over to the voting booth with my ballot, only to discover that there are some candidates about whom I know nothing whatsoever. I have to skip over those races, because I can't just vote blindly, so I end up feeling like a total loser in the citizenship category.

But not this time! Oh, no! I'm doing my homework. I little googling turned up this helpful site for all of us Wisconsin voters: The Voter Public Access page. Enter your address and you'll be shown the sample ballot for your particular ward.

Turns out I was already familiar with all the races on my ballot this time, so no surprises there.

Part Two: Stop the insanity of Wisconsin's Frankenstein Veto! Vote "Yes" on this referendum question:


QUESTION 1: Partial veto


QUESTION 1: “Partial veto. Shall section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution be amended to prohibit the governor, in exercising his or her partial veto authority, from creating a new sentence by combining parts of two or more sentences of the enrolled bill?”


This would prohibit the governor from crossing out certain key words in a bill to end up with exactly the opposite meaning. For example:

The governor shall not have the authority to crown himself King of the State of Wisconsin.

Currently, Governor Doyle can do exactly that. But, that's crazy, you say? Crazy but true.

Here's a real life example that will take your breath away. See how our governor used the partial veto power to:

increase a transfer from the transportation account to the general fund from $268 million to $427 million. To do so, he crossed out hundreds of words, stringing together individual words from unrelated sentences to write a new sentence. To get the $427 million figure, he took individual digits from five sets of numbers.

So, please vote "yes" on this ballot question and Stop The Insanity!

The Annunciation

Beautiful meditation today on the Feast of the Annunciation from Feminine Genius:

There is one more truth that the Annunciation teaches us, and it is so appalling that I can think of nothing uplifting to say about it that will take the sting away: perhaps it is best forgotten, because it tells us more about God than we are able to understand. The Almighty Father creates heaven and earth, the sun and all the stars; but when he really wants something done, he comes, the Omnipotent and Omniscient, to one of his poor, weak creatures — and he asks.

And, day by day, he keeps on asking us (From Universalis).

Hie thee, read the whole thing.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Shameless friend-promotion

Some good friends of ours, the Olsens, are in the newspaper today. The Olsens own and operate the Bayfield Apple Company. They harvest the state's largest raspberry crop, make all-natural jams and jellies, and have created a unique apple mustard that's one of my favorites.

They also make the world's best apple cider. Yes, this sounds over the top, but honestly, it's that good. I always used to think of apple cider as a hot drink for cold weather, but the Olsens introduced us to an even better option: the frozen cider slush for summer.

We learned about this on one of our visits to them some years back. We checked into our hotel room and discovered a delightful surprise: our friends had arranged for a half-thawed jug of cider and a set of cups to be delivered to our room. Wasn't that sweet? I've never forgotten how great that cider "slush" tasted on a blistering summer day after a long drive.

Anyway, today the Olsens and their orchard are featured in a Journal-Sentinel article in the Travel section about eco-friendly travel destinations in Wisconsin.

From the article:

A variety of apple products are efficiently made and sold here. In fact, the only remains from a bushel of apples may be a few seeds, some skin and a couple stems. All the rest has gone into products: 2.5 gallons of cider and 36 jars of apple butter.

Raspberries also grow on some of the 80 acres. Each year customers bring back their wood crates to get them refilled with more raspberries. "They are very conscientious. They don't want to waste anything," Olsen says. For information: www.bayfieldapple.com

They take orders on their website, in case you're interested in some of their jams or apple mustard.

Friday, March 28, 2008

Powerful examples of faith

The Today show has been covering an amazing story of mistaken identity. Two years ago, two young women coming home from a college function were in a horrible car crash; one died and one survived but with serious head injuries.

But the identities of the girls were mixed up, so that the deceased girl's family, the Von Ryns, thought their daughter, Laura, was still alive, and the living girl's family, the Ceraks, thought they'd buried their daughter, Whitney.

For five weeks, one family kept vigil at a girl's hospital bed, while the other mourned the the loss of their daughter, and yet praised God for her life and trusted that she was with Him in heaven.

Then the injured girl came out of her coma. And during a therapy session, she wrote her name: Whitney.

So the families had to switch places: The Ceraks could rejoice that their daughter was alive, while the Van Ryns had to grapple with the fact that their daughter was already buried.

From this article:

As people of faith, didn’t they ever ask, “How can God allow this to happen?”

“Not so much,” Don Van Ryn replied. “Over the years, God has shown himself to us, and we kind of know his character. We know that bad things happen to good people. We believe that God is sovereign, and he takes an active part in our lives, and even in sorrow there is joy.”

And this morning, when Whitney was trying to explain her thoughts about why all this happened, one of the things she said was:

"To glorify His name through all of us, even at the hardest times."

I'm always very moved when families with a strong faith are interviewed on TV; I think they often confound the interviewer and probably a lot of the viewers. Something terrible happened to you: Where's the bitterness? Why aren't you suing someone? Surely you don't still believe in God? And as Matt Lauer explicity asked this morning, "Where's the anger?"

And to everything, the foundation of their answer is always, "We believe." And implicitly, "We love."

Without a doubt, the most heartrending example of this was the Willis family. They lost six of their children in a horrific car fire on I-94 in Milwaukee. Their testimony of faith in a good God, in spite of the terrible loss they suffered, is humbling:

"Psalm 34 says, 'I will bless the Lord at all times: His praise shall continually be in my mouth. O, taste and see that the Lord is good.' Janet and I want to praise and thank God. There is no question in our minds that God is good, and we praise Him in all things. God is a great God."

I hope I never am tested in that way, but whatever bad things happen in my life, I hope I will have that same response: I believe, I trust, I love, I praise.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

And more good news today!

This time, it's about that California homeschooling case. From Michele Malkin:

A state appeals court will reconsider last month’s controversial decision that said parents who home-school their children must have a teaching credential.

The 2nd District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles granted a rehearing Tuesday, essentially voiding the 3-0 decision until it rules again. The decision will now allow home-schooling organizations that had blasted the decision to weigh in.

Read the whole article here in the Mercury News.

And you've gotta love this bon mot from one of the links at Michele's post:

When I told one of my sons [who had been homeschooled] about the California ruling, he said, “That’s just stupid! What are they going to do next? Say you can’t cook for your family unless you’re a licensed chef?

About that ban on incandescent light bulbs

Here's some good news (h/t Lileks):

By Kevin Diaz, Star Tribune

WASHINGTON - How many members of Congress does it take to change a light bulb? Americans may soon find out, courtesy of a contrarian piece of legislation introduced this month by Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota

Titled the "Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act," the bill seeks to repeal the nationwide phase-out of conventional light bulbs, the kind that have been used for more than a century -- pretty much since the invention of the incandescent light bulb.

I am thrilled about this! In fact, I just called Rep. Bachman, who not only is smart about lightbulbs but is also a pro-life Republican, and left a message of support. It doesn't matter that I'm not her constituent, I'm still going to thank her for this.

If you recall, I really don't like the idea of mandated florescent bulbs.

Do you want to call Rep. Bachman, too? Here you go: (202) 225-2331.

Spring Decluttering!

My friend Love2Learn Mom (who is not just a virtual friend but a real-life friend, too) inspired me today.

She has a great post on the joys of decluttering.

Decluttering -- otherwise known around here as "Throwing This Junk Out" -- is one of my favorite things.

And it's not just throwing stuff away, it's also packing things up to take to Goodwill or St Vincent de Paul, making up boxes of books to sell at the next homeschool group get-together or rummage sale, and getting more organized about the things that you really do need and want to keep.

My favorite decluttering mantra (mantras? mantrae? mantri??)

  • "Clutter can't be organized." This is SUCH a good rule. I'm pretty sure it's from Flylady. No amount of clever shelving or great bins and boxes will keep true clutter organized. So when the craft closet is a complete mess again just a day after you organize it, there's clutter. When the plastic boxes of Barbies and their accessories is totally trashed two days after organizing it, there's clutter. Get rid of a bunch of it. How much?

  • "40%". One of my second cousins says that we could all stand to get rid of 40% of our stuff and it would be a very good thing. I agree!
  • "If it doesn't make you smile, it has to go." Another from Flylady. Do you have stuff that makes you feel guilty? I did. Curriculum materials I'd never used, or hadn't used in years. Books I hadn't read that I knew I never would. Craft projects I'd started but never finished. They all reproached me from the shelves. So, they're gone. You have to be brutal sometimes.

So, now I'm fired up to start decluttering some more. I did our craft room two days ago. The basement storage areas were done after Christmas. The garage desperately needs it but that will wait till the warm weather comes. IF it ever comes.

Maybe today I'll tackle the upstairs closets.

In honor of Love2Learn Mom, I've posted a little poll over on the sidebar. You only have till tomorrow to answer it!

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Take the Vote-Chooser Test

It was right on the money for me.

Take the Vote Chooser test and see if it works for you, too.

The only frustrating part was that some of the questions should have had additional options. But take it anyway, and just choose the answer that's closest to what you would say.

Oh, and did any of you take that awareness test? How'd you do? Did you get the number of passes correctly?

And ... did you see the moonwalking bear?!?

Come ON somebody post a comment for me here, please! I'm dying to know if you saw it!

Because I didn't, of course.

[Update: Is that not pathetic to beg for comments? Oh yes, I know it is. *sigh* But thank you to my friends Love2Learn Mom and Anonymous ... whoever you are... for adding comments about the VoteChooser and the Awareness Test! By the way, Anonymous, I got the number of passes correct, too, but just like you, missed that crazy bear.]

Conservative = rigid, intolerant, deaf, sheeple-like, or stuck in time.

Gotta love this short article in the Chicago Tribune summarizing a recent sociological study. Let's analyze it for examples of liberal bias, shall we?

It's popular wisdom that people become more rigid in their thinking, more politically and socially conservative as they age.

First erroneous liberal assumption: "more rigid in their thinking = more politically and socially conservative".

Could you imagine the writer saying this instead:

It's popular wisdom that people become wiser and clearer in their thinking, more politically and socially conservative as they age.

No, I can't imagine a reporter saying that, either.

OK, let's move on to the next paragraph.

Researchers who examined the attitudes of more than 46,000 Americans over a 32-year period found that their views about such issues as extramarital sex, race relations, childbirth outside marriage and homosexuality did not become less accepting as they grew older—and that a person's attitudes on such topics could not be predicted simply by their age.

The erroneous assumption here, of course, is that "conservative = less accepting", with the implication that "more accepting" (of anything, apparently) is good.

How about "conservative = less accepting of bad behavior and its socially-destructive consequences"?

Do you also notice how "race relations" is lumped in there with "extramarital sex, childbirth outside marriage, and homosexuality"? Now why is that? How did the study define "race relations", exactly? The conservatives I know are very non-bigoted people, so if there's an implication that conservatives are racist, that's yet another erroneous liberal assumption.

So, this study says that people don't get more conservative as they age. But the lead researcher, Nicholas Danigelis (who, by the way, was an instructor at the University of Wisconsin - Madison from 1972 - 1975) said there are three reasons why older people might "appear" to be more conservative than younger ones:

physiological changes such as hearing loss; the process of becoming socialized to believe certain ideas; and the "period effect"—having lived through a signal event such as World War II.

Ah, I see. If older people seem more conservative, they're either deaf (how does that figure in, exactly?), unable to think for themselves because of "socialization" (from which liberals are apparently exempt), and stuck in time (again, liberals -- aging hippies, perhaps? -- are apparently exempt).

Well. That explains everything. Or maybe nothing.

The one thing that this article really does explain is that the media is full of liberal bias.

But we already knew that, didn't we?

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

How observant are you? Take this test!

I love this! And no, it's not one of those scary videos that suddenly blasts a horrifying image and sound at you.

So go ahead and see how aware you are:



H/T to my brother.

Monday, March 24, 2008

This is a laundry emergency!

Remember when I wrote about Shout Color Catchers?

Well, a couple days ago somebody came to my blog from doing a search on this dreadful phrase:

"Shout Color Catchers Discontinued"

Nooooooooooooooooooooo!

That's exactly what I was afraid of! That's why I had that dopey Lemonade Stand on my site for awhile! That's why I practically begged all of you laundry-doing moms to go out and buy that product!

So now I live in fear that this rumor may be true.

If you don't believe me that this is a really great, truly worthwhile product that will save you lots of money in ruined clothes and lots of frustration as well as the embarrassment of everybody having pink undies, then just read these rave reviews. Eighteen of them, all five stars! OK, there's the one person who seems disgruntled but I don't get that at all.

So, please drop what you're doing, and right now, RIGHT NOW! run out to the store and buy as many of these as you can.

Thank you.

And you can thank me later.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Easter egg photo gallery

I love Easter eggs.

I love dying them with the family, and then setting them out on this cute little vintage plate I found at the library gift shop really cheep (ha! get it? "Cheep!" I crack myself up.)

I love these beautiful eggs at my aunt's house:


She hand-painted them years and years ago:


And every Easter, brings them out to hang on the wide-spread branches of the egg tree.


I love Easter eggs.

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Easter Joy

We've got it now!

Just got back from our annual pre-Easter family confession, which would have been yesterday, but 15 inches of snow will put a crimp in the best of plans.



But in spite of all the snow, we know that spring will be here soon. Those flower pots will soon be brimming with impatiens, bright spots of color and life in the shade of the birch tree.



Those "winter interest" perennial stalks will soon have new green shoots.



The glider swing will be available for use again, free and unencumbered.



And these battered and broken evergreen bushes, weighted down by this year's snowfall -- the 2nd snowiest winter ever in Milwaukee -- will soon be standing up tall, showing new growth, ready to start anew.

Are you feeling the metaphor with me here? I hope so. It's all part of the Easter joy!

Friday, March 21, 2008

As Lent draws to a close

This Lent has been bookended with snowstorms.

On Ash Wednesday, a storm dumped about a foot of snow on us; we had to cancel our plans to go to Confession and receive ashes.

Today, another storm is covering our part of the world with a foot or more of snow. Once again, our good Lenten plans are canceled. Today we're missing our tradition of family confession, a fish fry, and the beautiful Tenebrae service at the Basilica.

But, as my friend Love2Learn Mom noted, Lent isn't about making plans and sticking to them. As she says, "The theme of Lent this year seems to be "*YOU* are not the one in control."

So very true.

Not all of our plans had to be abandoned, of course. We did our usual "give ups", which are always fruitful. You learn how attached you've become to certain perfectly legitimate treats, and how beneficial it is to mortify the flesh by denying it those good things. We tried to increase our prayerfulness, and did some wonderful Lenten projects (which I always meant to blog about... one of these days....) We also tried harder to prune away those thorny sins of selfishness and lack of charity toward each other.

But most of our "offering up" this Lent was handed to us by events. The snowstorms, for sure, but much more.

There was sickness. This was one of the worst winters we've ever had for viruses that swept through the whole family, again and again. It's hard for me to remember a stretch of more than a week or so where somebody wasn't sick. And it continues: I came down with a miserable cold-achy-coughing virus yesterday.

There was the sadness and stress associated with having to admit Dad to the hospital again for testing, and for another stint in rehab. There's no way of sugar coating that, really: it's a nursing home, and nursing homes -- even the really good ones, which this is -- are hard places to be.

My Dad is doing a little better, thank God, but it's been a cross of loneliness and suffering for him. Between my mom and my three siblings in town, we're there many hours every day, but still, he keenly feels the separation from home when he's alone.

It's been hard for all of us, too, (though obviously not nearly as difficult) with time away from our homes and families, time spent traveling to the rehab center, all the worries about how Dad is doing, and just an aching sorrow at the cruelties and indignities, big and small, inflicted on us by aging.

So, Lent came to us according to God's will, in a much more meaningful way than if we'd been able to complete all our carefully made Lenten plans, according to our own wills. And that certainly helped teach us the life lesson that "we are not the ones in control".

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Our Catholic Seder / Holy Week Passover Dinner

Some years ago I started hearing about Catholic families who hold a version of a Jewish Seder on Holy Thursday night. After a year or two of trying different things, some successful, some not so much, we've finally settled on a tradition that really works for our family.

First I have to say that this is in no way meant to be an authentic Seder dinner, obviously, as we are Catholic, not Jewish.

It's also done with the utmost respect for our Jewish friends, our "older brothers in the faith" (that includes a blogger friend I've never actually met, and my Jewish cousins-in-law). They'll very quickly see that there is nothing kosher about what I do with this meal. I hope they won't be horrified by that, but instead will understand the spirit in which it's done.

There's also a chance that my Catholic friends will be horrified by the amateurish nature of our Seder / Passover meal ... but I hope they'll remember that amateurs do things for the love of it. This is definitely a labor of love.

So, as I said, instead of trying to re-create an authentic Seder, which would of course end up being very inauthentic, we've adapted some of the elements of a traditional Jewish Passover meal to our Catholic Holy Week traditions. My hope is that we'll learn more about our Judeo-Christian heritage, appreciate the beautiful symbolism of the elements of a Seder, and come to a deeper understanding of the relationship between the Last Supper, which was a Passover meal, the Passion of Jesus Christ, and the Holy Mass of the Catholic Church.

A couple of things:

  • The whole family needs to be very familiar with the story of the Israelites in captivity in Egypt, of the first Passover which required them to kill and eat an unblemished lamb and paint their doorposts with its blood, and of the Exodus into freedom and ultimately (years later) the Promised Land.
  • We've sometimes had our Seder on Holy Thursday, sometimes on Holy Saturday, and this year, we had it yesterday. It's a moveable feast, for us, depending on what's happening with the family at the time. The only non-negotiable for me is that it happens during Holy Week.
  • I've also made our Passover dinner considerably shorter than a true Seder, as a concession to our very late dinner hours. With a late-working husband, and now a daughter who works till 7 or 8 p.m., we have to keep to just the basics so that bedtime doesn't become insanely later than it already is.

But, we still manage to make it special! And it's become a tradition that I really look forward to.

So, here's our simple, homemade version of a Catholic Passover Supper. You'll need the following directions for the food and table preparation, and then this Word document with the traditional four question and answers adapated for a Christian ceremony.

For the main meal (serves 6 - 8)

4 small lamb chops (for just a taste of lamb per person, or, if you want to splurge, buy a leg of lamb, or enough chops for the whole family)
1 roasting chicken (if you're only providing a "taste" of lamb for everyone, as I do)
Side dishes according to your preference (I often make asparagus and rice or potatoes; no leavened bread, however!)

For the charoset

1 apple
1/2 cup finely chopped walnuts
2 Tablespoons honey
2 Tablespoons red wine
Cinnamon to taste

Core and dice the apple; put it and the walnuts into a medium size bowl. Add the honey and wine (the quantities are approximate; add more or less to taste) and mix. Add a little bit of cinnamon to taste (optional). The charoset should be a pleasantly sweet, sticky, tangy mixture that holds together a little bit. (Add more honey if you need to.)

For the ceremonial dipping

1 bunch green leaf or romaine lettuce, parsley, or other "bitter" greens or herbs
1 package Matzoh (or other unleavened crackers in a pinch, as when the store is sold out, as happened to me yesterday...)
1 small bowl or custard cup filled with salt water

For the ceremonial cups of wine

Have sparkling grape juice for the kids, and real wine for the adults. (If you were my German grandmother, you'd pour a thimble-sized wine glass of real wine even for the little kids. Good for the digestion, you know. But that's beside the point, and completely politically incorrect these days.) A true Seder would have four separate cups; we use the same wine glass with enough in it for four (generous) "sips".

Putting it all together

Place the bowl of salt water in the middle of a decorative tray. Surround it with the lettuce or other greens. The salt water represents the tears of slavery. Sin enslaves us today, just as much as the Pharoah enslaved the Israelites thousands of years ago.

Place the matzoh on another decorative tray or serving plate, with a custard cup of charoset in the center. (Plan to refill that cup often!) Charoset represents the mortar that the enslaved Israelites used between the bricks when they were enslaved in Egypt, when building for the Pharoah.

If you're making chicken, roast it as you normally would. Roast the lamb, or, if you're having just a few lamb chops, you can pan fry them as I do. In a true Seder, my understanding is that no roasted meat would be eaten. Ever since the destruction of the Temple, just a roasted lamb bone is present on the table as a reminder of the original sacrifice. However, we Christians eat the lamb in remembrance of both the original Passover, and Eucharist of the Lamb of God.

Prepare the side dishes so that they'll be ready at serving time with a minimum of fuss, as you want to be seated at the table for the ceremonial part of the meal which comes first. I try to keep the food pretty simple.

Set a fancy table: This is where I break the "keep it simple" rule. You need your good company tablecloth, the good china and crystal, and candles. Yes, I mean it. Yes, I know it means hand-washing the dishes. It's worth it. This is special. The only concession I've made to the "good dishes" rule is that when the kids were really little, I used those plastic disposable champagne or wine glasses for them. But now, even the 8 year old gets the good stuff. It works out just fine.

For a centerpiece we used the fresh palms from last Sunday, laid down the middle of the table.

Put the two serving trays (with the lettuce or herbs on one, and the matzoh on the other) on the table.

And if you have them, give everyone a small sofa pillow or other small pillow to sit against on their chairs, to approximate reclining at table.

Call everyone to come sit down. Have Dad light the candle.

Then, use the this script, or any version of it that you like. I cribbed this together from a whole lot of sources (including several Catholic Culture pages and this one that I think is by a Rabbi. My version is, let's just say, succinct.

After you've completed this ceremonial portion of the meal, serve the rest of the dinner.

Over the years, we've used other elements of a real Seder, such as having a roasted (hard-boiled) egg on the table, hiding a piece of Matzoh, having an extra chair for the unseen guest, and so on. This version is stripped down to the basics, but it works for us.

If you want a much more detailed -- and I'm sure deeper, richer, and holier -- version, I would suggest reading Come to the Table: A Catholic Passover Seder for Holy Week written by a Jewish woman who converted to Catholicism. I haven't read it yet myself, but it comes highly recommended by my friend Kristen McGuire.

If you try my simplified approach, or if you have your own version of a Catholic Seder -- or even if you just read this far! -- I'd love to hear about it.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

McCain just not conservative enough for you?

In case you're still thinking that there's not much difference between the candidates because McCain isn't sufficiently pure as a conservative, here's a little something to think about, from the Weekly Standard:

Justice John Paul Stevens turns 88 in April, and by January 2009 five other justices will be from 69 to 75 years old. If Barack Obama is elected president, he will probably--with the benefit of resignations by liberal justices eager for him to be the president who chooses their successors--have the opportunity to appoint two or three Supreme Court justices in his first term, with another two or three in a potential second term.

So what kind of justices would Obama nominate? Let's start with the fact that he's been ranked as "the most liberal of all 100 senators". The most liberal; further left than Ted Kennedy, Russ Feingold, or John Kerry.

Reflect on that for a minute.

Next, Obama would abandon the traditional standard of nominating dispassionate judges who attempt to balance the scales of justice in accord with the highest law of the land. Instead, his criteria would be emotion, sympathy, and identity politics:

Indeed, in setting forth the sort of judges he would appoint, Obama has explicitly declared: "We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom, the empathy to understand what it's like to be poor or African-American or gay or disabled or old--and that's the criterion by which I'll be selecting my judges." So much for the judicial virtue of dispassion. So much for a craft of judging that is distinct from politics.

The Oprahfication of this country will be complete.

Here's more:

Obama's constitutional activism is particularly evident on the touchstone issue of Roe v. Wade. Obama calls abortion "one of the most fundamental rights we possess" and promises to "make preserving women's rights under Roe v. Wade a priority as president." [emphasis added] He has harshly criticized the Court's 2007 ruling that the federal partial-birth abortion act (which was supported by broad bipartisan majorities in Congress, including abortion supporters like Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy) is constitutionally permissible.

So, my fellow conservatives and pro-lifers, maybe you're not too crazy about McCain. Maybe I'm not, either. I said I'd never vote for him. I'm still annoyed about the McCain-Feingold bill. I know he's not as conservative as we'd like.

And to that I say: so what?

The stakes are too high to be nit-picky about it.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

St. Patrick's Day Dinner

Last night I made corned beef and cabbage, with boiled red potatoes and carrots.

The best part was seeing the looks on the kids' faces as they tasted this semi-authentic Irish dinner for the first time. Let's just say their Irish eyes weren't too happy.

And the one-fourth Irish part of me wasn't too thrilled about it, either.

So, what other culinary adventures do we have for this week? Well, I usually make a Catholic version of a Seder dinner for Holy Thursday, and since this is something we've really become fond of, I do hope to post more about it very soon.

Stations of the Cross

For Holy Week:



These life-size bronze figures were sculpted by Mickey Wells. They're located just outside of Groom, Texas, about 70 miles from Amarillo. Check this link for "Cross Ministries" to learn a little bit more about it.

The slide show doesn't have all the stations in the correct order, but it's very moving nonetheless.

H/T to a dear friend who emailed me the photos (thanks, K.!). Some Googling this morning found them online with an embed option.

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Thursday, March 13, 2008

The David Mamet article that everybody and his brother is talking about

I think every single page on the entire internet has quoted and linked to this article by David Mamet: Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal'.

So I will pile on, too, and add my own favorite quote, the end of which made me truly laugh out loud:

The Constitution, written by men with some experience of actual government, assumes that the chief executive will work to be king, the Parliament will scheme to sell off the silverware, and the judiciary will consider itself Olympian and do everything it can to much improve (destroy) the work of the other two branches. So the Constitution pits them against each other, in the attempt not to achieve stasis, but rather to allow for the constant corrections necessary to prevent one branch from getting too much power for too long.

Rather brilliant. For, in the abstract, we may envision an Olympian perfection of perfect beings in Washington doing the business of their employers, the people, but any of us who has ever been at a zoning meeting with our property at stake is aware of the urge to cut through all the pernicious bullsh*t and go straight to firearms.
Dang, I wish I could write like that.

Sunday, March 09, 2008

About my Dad

Dad was back in the hospital again. This time, it was for a battery of tests. (Why do they always say "battery"? Perhaps because you feel like you're being assaulted by the doctors and probes and machines?)

We're now beginning a very difficult phase. I've seen it before, and I think I know what's coming, but that doesn't make it any easier. In fact, that makes it much more difficult.

I find great comfort in these verses:

My son, take care of your father when he is old; grieve him not as long as he lives.

Even if his mind fail, be considerate with him; revile him not in the fullness of your strength.

For kindness to a father will not be forgotten, it will serve as a sin offering--it will take lasting root.

In time of tribulation it will be recalled to your advantage, like warmth upon frost it will melt away your sins.

By the way, this is one of those posts that I debated publishing; the German in me hates to reveal anything too personal. I started and re-started it half a dozen times, and ended up deleting most everything I was going to say about what's been going on.

However, I'm sure that those of you know me will read between the lines and understand. I also know that you are the same people who would be inclined to say a prayer for him, and for us. So, thank you.

Just call me Basil.

Couldn't resist taking this fun little quiz after seeing it at both Studeo and Family Centered Life:




You Are Basil



You are quite popular and loved by post people.

You have a mild temperament, but your style is definitely distinctive.

You are sweet, attractive, and you often smell good.




Don't know if that's all true, but I do love basil and even grow it in my herb garden.

Herb garden... that makes me think of spring... do you think this winter will ever end?

Friday, March 07, 2008

From the sublime to the silly

This fits right in with my "post" from "yesterday": The "Blog" of "Unnecessary" Quotation Marks.

Gotta love the "Internet"!

H/T, in a round-about way, to Wigderon's Library and Pub.

Just maybe the best video I could ever put into a post.

Do yourself a favor and WATCH THIS! The whole thing is powerful, but especially the ending.

Media bias? What media bias?

I got another email from my homeschool friend who'd alerted me to the Reuters "article" by the "reporter" that I posted about "yesterday". (Oops, sorry, got a little carried away with those sneer quotes.)

She said a friend wrote to her, saying,

It does make one wonder how a story in the opposite direction would go. Do you think we'd ever see something like this in the Star Tribune?

The Clinton machine included "bitter, aging feminists" who volunteered for her in droves. Liberal secularists who pay other people to "raise" their children away from home, they could easily be spotted at her campaign stops: Angry mothers in designer clothes accompanied by brow-beaten male partners, occasionally toting one child. They sometimes swore out loud upon hearing of Obama's success.

May I just say: Heh.

Thursday, March 06, 2008

How does Mainstream Media view homeschoolers?

For a hint, just read this, from a Reuters story:

The Huckabee machine included "homeschoolers" who volunteered for him in droves. Conservative Christians who "school" their children at home, they could easily be spotted at his campaign stops: mothers with long hair and home-made dresses and fathers with crew-cuts surrounded by mobs of children with Huckabee signs. They sometimes prayed aloud for his success.

The rubes. They prayed for him.

And don't you love the sneerquotes around "homeschoolers" and "school"?

Just for fun, the reporter threw in some gratuitous remarks about hair style, clothing, and the "mobs" of children.

So, that's our lesson for today on "How MSM views homeschoolers, Christians and conservatives".

Stop by soon for a lesson in "How MSM views liberals, atheists, and government schoolers".

Oh, wait, we don't really need a lesson in that, do we?

H/T to a "homeschool" friend

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Bad news for homeschoolers in California is bad news for all of us

A California appeals court just ruled that parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their own children. They ordered the children to be enrolled in a government school. [Update: The option for a private school remained open as well.]

The appeals court cited a U.S. Supreme Court case (Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 [45 S.Ct. 571, 69 L.Ed. 1070, 39 A.L.R. 468],

No question is raised concerning the power of the state reasonably to regulate all schools, to inspect, supervise and examine them, their teachers and pupils; to require that all children of proper age attend some school, that teachers shall be of good moral character and patriotic disposition, that certain studies plainly essential to good citizenship must be taught, and that nothing be taught which is manifestly inimical to the public welfare.

The Supreme Court said this applied to all schools, so, I'm assuming that it would apply to public as well as private schools.

Thus, a couple of questions:

  • "That teachers shall be of good moral character and patriotic disposition". If this was enforced, what percentage of current public school teachers do you think would be summarily dismissed?
  • "That nothing be taught which is manifestly inimical to the public welfare". If this was enforced, what percentage of social studies (read: revisionist history and fraudulent global warming "science") and sex education classes (read: education in promiscuity and perversion) do you think would be summarily dropped?

Back to the California case. The judges cited the paragraph above from Pierce v. Society of Sisters, but failed to quote a subsequent section which was really the key to that ruling:

The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the state to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. [Emphasis mine]

Pierce v. Society of Sisters overturned a 1922 referendum in Oregon that mandated attendance at public schools. The California appeals court misused that decision by taking one paragraph from it to buttress their weak argument against the religious and educational freedom of California parents.

The California judges' hostility to home schooling and religious freedom is manifest. The decision includes:

  • repeated references to "uncredentialed" parents, as though being credentialed by the state guarantees that one will be a good teacher.
  • a slap at the Christian home study program the parents had used, saying it had participated in "the deprivation of the children’s right to a legal education".
  • a snide reference to the family "history" when forbidding the parents to hire a private tutor, saying it would "pose too many difficulties" for the tutor. The family apparently doesn't meet the judges' standards for a "quality" family; should the state credential parents just to be parents, too? Does having a less-than-perfect family life mean you give up your First Amendment rights?
  • a sneer at those parents, and thus any parent, who holds religious reasons for homeschooling: "Moreover, such sparse representations [of religious beliefs] are too easily asserted by any parent who wishes to home school his or her child". Since when do religious beliefs have to meet some arbitrary standard of "difficulty of assertion" to be legitimate? And if home schooling is a fundamental right (as I believe it is), since when does a parent need any kind of religious belief, sparse or not, to educate his children at home?

Some have said that the parents involved in the California case are hardly poster children for the homeschool movement. Even if that's true (and I'm not totally willing to concede the point, as California child welfare authorities had determined that the children were not being abused and were doing fine), it doesn't matter.

Hard cases make bad law. This is particularly bad law, hard case or not.

For more, see Bending the Twig, (check that post and then others posted after it),World Net Daily, and Principled Discovery.

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

Arab-Americans being rounded up? Who? Where?

The American Thinker calls attention to this statement by Obama:

"If there is an Arab-American family being rounded up without benefit of an attorney, it threatens my civil liberties."

He says "if", to ostensibly make it hypothetical, but we know that his audience doesn't hear the "if".

What they hear is, "The evil Bush is rounding up innocent Americans and throwing them in jail! The evil Bush is destroying our civil liberties! Bush evil, Obama good!"

He also says Arab American family, to create the picture of an ordinary, law-abiding family, kids, pets, 2-car garage, quietly eating dinner one night when suddenly the goons break down the door.

But this is nonsense. We all know it hasn't happened. As the American Thinker put it,

Even the suggestion it could occur is a profound insult to our nation and our citizenry. It is an image of the gulag, the death camp, the dictatorship, and so inappropriate in any discussion about America, it is beneath our contempt.

Even in those first raw days after 9/11, there was never any rioting against Muslims in this country. There never was any backlash against Arab Americans.

If anything, we've bent over backwards not to make any assumptions about Arabs or Muslims. We all have to endure shoe-removals and pat-downs at the airports, just so we don't appear to be doing any race-profiling.

Once more, we get nothing but demagoguery from Obama, and yet nother smear against America from a far-left candidate.

Monday, March 03, 2008

Fun with Student Driving

So the 15 year old has a newly minted Driver's Permit and is in a big hurry to use it.

She hasn't even started her Behind-The-Wheel classes yet, but we've been out driving several times already. First it was the empty school parking lot, then the parking lot plus a trip around the block, then a half hour on the subdivision streets.

Things heard from behind the wheel:

"Mom! I can't multi-task! I can steer, or I can press the gas pedal, but not both! You pick!"

"Help!! A car is coming! What do I do what do I do?!?"

"Mom! Don't distract me by talking! This is LIFE THREATENING!"

"I hate it when there are other cars on the road!!"

Things heard from the passenger side:


"Slow down slowdown SLOW! DOWN!"

"Good, good, you're doing fine!"

"Stop! STOP!!!"

"Hug the right, HUG THE RIGHT!"

"OK, good, good, that was good, you're doing fine, really, that's good... OK, slow down... SLOW DOWN ... OK, good, now make the turn... OK, good, good, now give it some gas ... come on let's get it up to 15 mph... good, good....you're doing fine, really!"

Wow. All I can say is that the Drivers Ed teachers at the high school are AWESOME, and brave.

Of course, they have a second brake pedal, too.

And sweetie, if when you read this, please know that I mean it, you're doing really well! If I didn't think so, would I be entrusting my life to you in that car to take you practice driving?

Well, would I?

No, of course not.

I'd make your Dad do it.

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Is this not beautiful?

Deep calls to deep
At the thunder of thy cataracts;
All thy waves and thy billows
Have gone over me.

By day the Lord commands his
Steadfast love;
And at night his song is with me,
A prayer to the God of my life.

Psalm 42:7-8